4.7 Article

Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial event-related fMRI

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 2135-2141

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R21 DA15882] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [P01 MH62196, R01 MH63255, R01 MH091864] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the current study we examined the influence of preceding context on attentional conflict and response competition using a flanker paradigm. Nine healthy right-handed adults participated in a rapid mixed trial event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, in which increasing numbers of either compatible or incompatible trials preceded an incompatible trial. Behaviorally, reaction times on incompatible trials increased as a function of the number of preceding compatible trials. Several brain regions showed monotonic changes to the preceding context manipulation. The most common pattern was observed in anterior cingulate, dorsolateral prefrontal, and superior parietal regions. These areas showed an increase in activity for incompatible trials as the number of preceding compatible trials increased and a decrease in activity for incompatible trials as the number of preceding incompatible trials increased. Post hoc analysis showed that while the MR signal in the anterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal regions peaked before the superior parietal region, the dorsolateral prefrontal MR signal peaked early and remained at this level. These findings are consistent with the conflict monitoring theory that postulates that the anterior cingulate cortex detects or monitors conflict, while PFC is involved in control adjustments that may then lead to modulation of superior parietal cortex in top-down biasing of attention. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available