4.5 Article

Kinetics of quiescent cord blood stem/progenitor cells with high proliferative potential in stem-cell expansion culture

Journal

CYTOTHERAPY
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 500-508

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14653240310003602

Keywords

ex vivo expansion; HPP-Q cells; UCB-AC133(+) cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The most primitive engrafting hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) resides mainly in a tumor growth factor-beta (TGF-beta)-dependent quiescent phase of the cell cycle. In this study, ex vivo expansion of UC blood (UCB) HSCs has been investigated, with the aim of showing whether quiescent HSCs can be recovered from expansion culture. Methods AC133(+) stem/progenitor cells from six full term-pregnancies UCB-samples were immunomagnetically selected, followed by ex vivo expansion culture in the presence of thrombopoietin (TPO), c-kit ligand (KL), flt-3 ligand (FL) and IL-6. Quiescent HSCs were detected by a clonogenic assay that allows the detection of multipotent and committed single-lineage quiescent stem/progenitor cells, named mHPP-Q and cHPP-Q, respectively, by means of a TGF-beta blocking Ab. Results Expansion culture of fresh selected AC133(+) cells for 1 week caused maintenance rather than expansion of mHPP-Q cells and a 1-fold increase in cHPP-Q cells. A further week culture initiated with 7-day expanded AC133(+) cells resulted in an additional 1.5-fold expansion of cHPP-Q while no mHPP-Q cells could be detected. Amplification of cHPP-Q cells in long-term expansion cultures initiated with 14-day expanded AC133(+) cells was observed for at least a further 4 weeks. Discussion A small proportion of HPP-Q cells recovered from 7-day expansion cultures retain their multilineage potential: longer culturing of these cells results in the loss of multilineage potential while they maintain quiescent behavior and high proliferative potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available