4.7 Article

The effects of the Pathways Obesity Prevention Program on physical activity in American Indian children

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages S62-S69

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.08.005

Keywords

American Indian children; physical activity; accelerometer; intervention

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-50869, HL-50895, HL-50867, HL-50907, HL-50885] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Inadequate opportunities for physical activity at school and overall low levels of activity contribute to the high prevalence of overweight and obesity in American-Indian children. Methods. A school-based physical activity intervention was implemented which emphasized increasing the frequency and quality of physical education (PE) classes and activity breaks. Changes in physical activity were assessed using the TriTrac-R3D accelerometer in a subsample of 580 of the students (34%) randomly selected from the Pathways study cohort. Baseline measures were completed with children in second grade. Follow-up measurements were obtained in the spring of the fifth grade. Results. Intervention schools were more active (+6.3 to +27.2%) than control schools at three of the four sites, although the overall difference between intervention and control schools (similar to10%) was not significant (P > 0.05). Boys were more active than girls by 17 to 21% (P less than or equal to .01) at both baseline and follow-up. Conclusions. Despite the trend for greater physical activity at three of four study sites, and an overall difference of similar to10% between intervention and control schools, high variability in accelerometer AVM and the opportunity to measure physical activity on only I day resulted in a the failure to detect the difference as significant. (C) 2003 American Health Foundation and Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available