Journal
RESEARCH EVALUATION
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 217-224Publisher
BEECH TREE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.3152/147154403781776618
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The bibliographic details of research papers underpinning five clinical advances in neonatal intensive care were collated and analysed using applied bibliometric techniques. After a time-lag of about 17 years, between 2% and 21% of research underpinning clinical advances in NIC could be described as basic. This observation is at odds with Comroe and Dripps' 1976 finding.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available