4.2 Article

Development and validation of an ECG algorithm for identifying the optimal ablation site for idiopathic ventricular outflow tract tachycardia

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages 1280-1286

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.03211.x

Keywords

ventricular tachycardia; premature ventricular contraction; electrocardiogram; catheter ablation; algorithm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ECG Algorithm and Outflow Tract Tachycardia. Introduction: Idiopathic ventricular outflow tract tachycardia or premature ventricular contractions (OT-VTs) can originate from several different sites in the outflow tract, including the left ventricular (LV) endocardium and epicardium. The aims of this study were (1) to develop an ECG algorithm to predict the origin of OT-VT and (2) to test prospectively the accuracy of the algorithm. Methods and Results: An algorithm was developed by correlating the 12-lead ECG findings with the catheter ablation site in 80 patients with OT-VT. The ECG characteristics of the QRS complex during the arrhythmia were analyzed. The catheter sites were verified by multiplane fluoroscopy. The outflow tract was classified into six subdivisions: right ventricular (RV) septum, RV free wall, RV near the His-bundle region, LV endocardium, left sinus of Valsalva (LSV), and LV epicardium remote from the LSV. An OT-VT originating from the LV epicardium remote from the LSV was defined as an OT-VT in which the earliest ventricuIar activation was recorded at the LSV and radiofrequency ablation from the LSV failed. This algorithm subsequently was tested prospectively in 88 patients. Overall sensitivity was 88% and specificity was 95%. The positive and negative predictive values were 88% and 96%, respectively. Conclusion: We describe a new ECG algorithm having a high sensitivity and specificity to identify the optimal ablation site for idiopathic ventricular outflow tachycardia or premature ventricular contractions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available