Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages 1128-1153Publisher
SWETS ZEITLINGER PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1076/jcen.25.8.1128.16724
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NIDCD NIH HHS [R01-DC00216, P50-DC01289] Funding Source: Medline
- NINDS NIH HHS [P50-NS22343] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Double dissociations play an important role in neuropsychology, but they are often identified through subjective estimates of high versus low performance, without considering the probability that such an outcome might have occurred by chance. To determine whether two measures come apart in an interesting way in brain-damaged patients, it is important to know the degree to which variance in one measure can be predicted by variance in the other. This study introduces a statistical procedure to determine the probability of a double dissociation when the correlation between measures is taken into account. Different quantitative definitions of dissociations were compared in two large samples of neurological patients, and applied to four pairs of measures (two for language, two for hemispatial neglect) with different degrees of intercorrelation (ranging from +.21 to +.84). If the correlation between measures is not taken into account, large numbers of dissociated cases may be missed, especially for measures that are highly correlated. There are also qualitative differences between methods in the identity of those individuals who meet each definition.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available