4.5 Article

Exercise training preserves coronary flow and reduces infarct size after ischemia-reperfusion in rat heart

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages 2510-2518

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00487.2003

Keywords

cardioprotection; superoxide dismutase

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-40306-14] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of endurance training on the resistance of the heart to left ventricular (LV) functional deficit and infarction after a transient regional ischemia and subsequent reperfusion was examined. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to an endurance exercise training (Tr) group or a sedentary (Sed) control group. After 20 wk of training, hearts were excised, perfused, and instrumented for assessment of LV mechanical function, and the left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded to induce a transient regional ischemia (1 h) that was followed by 2 h of reperfusion. Throughout much of the regional ischemia-reperfusion protocol, coronary flow rates, diastolic function, and LV developed pressure were better preserved in hearts from Tr animals. During the regional ischemia, coronary flow to myocardium outside the ischemic zone at risk (ZAR) was maintained in Tr hearts, whereas it progressively fell in Sed hearts. On release of the coronary artery ligature, flow to the ZAR was greater in Tr than in Sed hearts. Infarct size, expressed as a percentage of the ischemic ZAR, was significantly smaller in hearts from Tr rats (24 +/- 3 vs. 32 +/- 2% of ZAR, P < 0.05). Mn- and CuZn-SOD protein expression were higher in the LV myocardium of Tr animals (P < 0.05 for both isoforms). Our data indicate that long-term exercise training leads to infarct sparing and better maintenance of coronary flow and mechanical function after ischemia-reperfusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available