4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Analysis of acrylamide in food by isotope-dilution liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1020, Issue 1, Pages 121-130

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(03)00876-8

Keywords

food analysis; cereals; interlaboratory test; validation; isotope dilution methods; acrylamide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A confirmatory method for the determination of low levels of acrylamide in different food products is presented. The method entails extraction of acrylamide with water, precipitation of matrix constituents with acetonitrile, and two clean-up steps consecutively over Isolute Multimode and cation-exchange cartridges. The final extract is analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to positive electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry employing [C-13(3)-acrylamide as internal standard. For the chromatographic step, a LC column based on a polymethacrylate gel is employed which shows good retention of acrylamide under isocratic flow conditions (k' = 1.2). Mass spectral acquisition is done by selected reaction monitoring, choosing the characteristic transitions m/z 72-->55, 72-->54 and 72-->27. In-house validation data for breakfast cereals and crackers show good precision of the method, with intra- and interassay variation below 10%. The limits of detection for crackers and breakfast cereals, respectively are estimated at 15 and 20 mug/kg, and recoveries of fortified samples ranged between 58 and 76%. Furthermore, the method is applicable to a number of different food products, including biscuits, crisp bread, wafers, confectionery cocoa liquor, and nuts. Finally, the good results obtained in several small-scale interlaboratory tests provided additional confidence in the performance of the method. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available