4.6 Article

Microhollow cathode discharge stability with flow and reaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 36, Issue 23, Pages 2898-2907

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/36/23/006

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Under certain conditions, microhollow cathode (MHC) discharges display self-pulsing, with relaxation oscillations in voltage (V-d) and current (I-d). An equivalent circuit model of the discharge and circuit demonstrates that relaxation oscillations occur only if the load line crosses the discharge characteristic in the region of negative differential resistivity R-d equivalent to partial derivativeV(d)/partial derivativeI(d) The pulsing and steady-state current regimes could have implications on the use of the discharges as reactors. We present measurements and model results in a study of high pressure MHC discharges as flow reactors in the steady-state current regime. Flow of molecular gases through the intense discharge induces chemical modifications such as molecular decomposition. The MHC behaves approximately as a plug flow reactor with reactant conversion depending primarily on residence time in the plasma. Measured peak gas temperatures in the plasma of the order of 1000-2000 K suggest that endothermic reaction conversion should be thermodynamically favoured. Comparisons to literature values of thermal decomposition kinetics indicate that the MHC plasma has the decomposition activity of gas at 2000-3000 K. High gas temperatures and molecular dissociation induce a significant pressure drop through the plasma. A model calculation for flow through a cylindrical tube containing an intense plasma demonstrates that the increase of pressure drop across the plasma zone is due to the increase in gas mass-averaged velocity as a result of lower mass density associated with the temperature increase and creation of molecular fragments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available