4.6 Article

Importance of ascorbate peroxidases OsAPX1 and OsAPX2 in the rice pathogen response pathways and growth and reproduction revealed by their transcriptional profiling

Journal

GENE
Volume 322, Issue -, Pages 93-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2003.08.017

Keywords

copper; defense/stress response; Oryza sativa L. ev. Nipponbare; protein phosphatase inhibitors; signaling molecules; wound

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have identified and characterized two rice ascorbate peroxidase (OsAPX1 and OsAPX2) genes against diverse signals known to involve in defense/stress responses, using 2-week-old rice seedling in vitro model system. Oryza sativa ascorbate peroxidase I and 2 (OsAPX1/2) share 83% similarity to each other at amino acid level and belong to a small gene family in the rice genome. OsAPX1/2 show a weak constitutive expression in leaves. Their transcripts were up-regulated upon wounding (by cut), and diverse signals such as salicylic acid (SA), ethylene (using the ethylene generator, ethephon), abscisic acid (ABA), hydrogen peroxide, copper sulfate, protein phosphatase (PP) inhibitors, cantharidin (CN), endothall (EN) and okadaic acid (OA), and blast pathogen (Magnaporthe grisea) attack, but surprisingly not by jasmonic acid (JA). Interestingly, the OsAPX2 inductions were more potent and rapid than OsAPX1, whose expression increased gradually with time. These inductions were influenced by light signal(s), and showed requirement for certain de novo synthesized protein factor(s). Intriguingly, OsAPX1/2 mRNAs expression manifested a clear rhythmicity under light/dark cycle. Differential regulation of the OsAPX1/2 expressions by diverse environmental cues, including pathogen, and their developmental regulation in both young and reproductive stages strongly suggests their role in stress-signaling pathways and development in rice. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available