4.6 Article

Effects of aging and ischemia on adenosine receptor transcription in mouse myocardium

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.10.127

Keywords

aging; ischemia; adenosine receptors; gene expression; quantitative real-time PCR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The well-documented age-related change in ischemic tolerance may result from impaired adenosine-mediated cardioprotection. Additionally, ischemia itself may potentially modify adenosine signalling, contributing to the post-ischemic phenotype. This study investigates age- and ischemia-dependent changes in adenosine receptor transcript levels (Adora) for the A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) receptor subtypes in mouse myocardium. Hearts from young (2-4 months) and moderately aged (16-18 months) mice were subjected to 20-min ischemia and 45-min reperfusion. Ischemic tolerance was impaired in aged hearts, which recovered less than 30% ventricular pressure development (compared with similar to70% in young hearts), and lost 2-fold higher levels of lactate dehydrogenase during reperfusion (reflecting cellular disruption). Real-time PCR analyses revealed an age-related decline in Adora3 levels and induction of Adora2B. Curiously, this effect was mimicked by ischemia, which acutely reduced Adora3 levels and induced Adora2B in young (but not old) hearts. In contrast, in aged hearts ischemia selectively reduced levels of Adoral transcript (similar to2-fold) without altering transcript levels for the other receptors. These results demonstrate selective modulation of cardioprotective adenosine receptor transcription by both aging and ischemia. Reduced A(3) adenosine receptor transcription may contribute to impaired ischemic tolerance in aged hearts, whereas changes in Adora transcription induced by ischemia may impact on the post-ischemic phenotype at later time points. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available