4.4 Article

Sex-specific increase in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (The Copenhagen City Heart Study)

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 12, Pages 1419-1423

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.08.050

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently encountered cardiac arrhythmia. It is a risk factor for stroke and premature death. We studied the temporal changes in the prevalence of AF from 1976 to 1994 in a random population aged 50 to 89 years. The prevalence of AF, diagnosed from electrocardiograms (ECGs), was determined in 8,606 patients examined in 1976 to 1978, in 8,943 patients examined in 1981 to 1983, and in 6,733 subjecs examined in 1991 to 1994. Changes in, prevalence of AF were estimated by logistic regression analysis. In men, the age-standardized prevalence of AF increased from 1.4% in 1976 to 1978 (odds ratio [OR] 1.0, reference) to 1.9% in 1981 to 1983 (OR 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 2.1), and to 3.3% in 1991 to 1994 (OR 2.3,95% CI 1.6 to 3.4, p <0.001, adjusted for age). In women, the prevalence of AF decreased from 1.5% in 1976 to 1978 (OR 1.0, reference) to 1.0% in 1981 to 1983 (OR, 0.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.0), and to 1.1% in 1991 to 1994 (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.0), although the overall decrease was not significant (p = 0.11, adjusted for age). After adjusting for changes in comorbidity, body weight, and height, the increase in the prevalence of AF in men from 1976 to 1978 and from 1991 to 1994 remained significant (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.8, p = 0.002). Although unchanged in women, the prevalence of AF in men more than doubled from the 1970s to the 1990s. The factors responsible for this gender-specific increase in the prevalence of this common arrhythmia have yet to be identified. (C) 2003 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available