4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Investigation of equilibration and uncertainty contributions for the determination of inorganic mercury and methylmercury by isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 500, Issue 1-2, Pages 155-170

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00808-0

Keywords

inductive coupled plasma mass spectrometry; isotope dilution analysis; mercury speciation; uncertainty contributions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mass fractions of Hg and methylmercury, in two certified reference materials, NIST2710 and DORM-2, have been determined by total and species-specific isotope dilution analysis (IDA), respectively, and uncertainty budgets for each analysis calculated. The mass fraction of Hg in NIST2710 was determined by ID using multicollector sector field inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-SF-ICP-MS) whilst the mass fraction of methylmercury in DORM-2 was determined using HPLC coupled with quadrupole ICP-MS. The extent of equilibration between the spike and the particulate bound mercury compounds was studied temporally by monitoring the Hg-200:Hg-199 isotope amount ratio and by determining the total amount of Hg in the liquid phase. For the NIST2710 complete equilibration was only achieved when concentrated HNO3 in combination with a microwave digestion was employed, and good agreement between the found (31.7 +/- 4.0 mug g(-1), expanded uncertainty k = 2) and certified (32.6 +/- 1.8 mug g(-1)) values was obtained. For DORM-2 complete equilibration of methylmercury between the liquid and solid phases was achieved when using 50:50 H2O:CH3OH (v/v) and 0.01% 2-mercaptoethanol as the solvent. Even though only 50% of the analyte was extracted into the liquid phase, complete equilibration was achieved, hence, the found methylmercury mass fraction (4.25 +/- 0.47 mug g(-1), expanded uncertainty k = 2) was in good agreement with the certified value (4.47 +/- 0.32 mug g(-1)). (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available