4.7 Article

High-precision stellar radial velocities in the galactic center

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 599, Issue 2, Pages 1139-1156

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/379627

Keywords

Galaxy : center; infrared : stars; techniques : spectroscopic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present radial velocities for 85 cool stars projected onto the central parsec of the Galaxy. The majority of these velocities have relative errors of similar to1 km s(-1), or a factor of similar to30-100 smaller than those previously obtained with proper-motion or other radial velocity measurements for a similar stellar sample. The error in a typical individual stellar velocity, including all sources of uncertainty, is 1.7 km s(-1). Two similar data sets were obtained 1 month apart, and the total error in the relative velocities is 0.80 km s(-1) in the case where an object is common to both data sets. The data are used to characterize the velocity distribution of the old population in the Galactic center. We find that the stars have a Gaussian velocity distribution with a mean heliocentric velocity of -10.1 +/- 11.0 km s(-1) (blueshifted) and a standard deviation of 100.9 +/- 7.7 km s(-1); the mean velocity of the sample is consistent with no bulk line-of-sight motion with respect to the local standard of rest. At the 1 sigma level, the data are consistent with a symmetric velocity distribution about any arbitrary axis in the plane of the sky. We find evidence for a flattening in the distribution of late-type stars within a radius of similar to0.4 pc and infer a volume density distribution of r(-1/4) in this region. Finally, we establish a first epoch of radial velocity measurements that can be compared with subsequent epochs to measure small accelerations (1 km s(-1) yr(-1)), corresponding to the magnitude expected over a time span of several years for stars nearest to Sgr A*.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available