4.8 Article

Induction of colitis by a CD4+ T cell clone specific for a bacterial epitope

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2534546100

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA067529, R01-CA67529] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is now well established that the intestinal flora plays an important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, whether bacteria serve as the sole target of the immune response in this process or whether they act indirectly by triggering an anti-self response is still unclear. We have previously shown that specific pathogen-free IL-10-deficient (IL-10 KO) mice develop a T helper (Th1)-cytokine associated colitis after experimental infection with Hehcobacter hepaticus. We here show that H. hepaticus Ag (SHelAg)-specificCD4(+) Th1 clones transfer disease to H. hepaticus-infected T cell-deficient RAG KO hosts. Importantly, uninfected recipients of the SHelAg-specific clones did not develop intestinal inflammation, and a control Schistosoma mansonispecific Th1 clone did not induce colitis upon transfer to infected RAG KO mice. The disease-inducing T cell clones recognized antigen(s) (Ag) specifically expressed by certain Helicobacter species as they responded when stimulated in vitro with H. hepaticus and Helicobacter typhlonius Ag, but not when cultured with Ag preparations from Helicobacter pylori, various non-helicobacter bacteria, or with cecal bacterial lysate from uninfected mice. Characterization of the Ag specificity of one of the clones showed that it reacts uniquely with a 15-mer peptide epitope on the flagellar hook protein (FlgE) of H. hepaticus presented by I-A(b). Together, our results demonstrate that colitis can be induced by clonal T cell populations that are highly specific for target Ag on intestinal bacteria, suggesting that an aberrant T cell response directed against gut flora is sufficient to trigger IBD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available