4.8 Article

Fear of novelty in infant rats predicts adult corticosterone dynamics and an early death

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2535721100

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P01 AG018911] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [F32 HD008693, F32 HD08693] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R37 MH41788] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individuals who are fearful of novelty have a larger hypothalamic-pituita ry-adrenal axis response than do nonfearful individuals. We hypothesized that a fearful behavioral style emerging early in life would be associated with life-long altered adrenal activity. Because there is ample physiological evidence both costs and benefits of adrenal activation, we determined whether such a stable emotional-neuroendocrine trait was associated with differential morbidity and mortality. To conduct such lifespan work, we studied a relatively short-lived mammal: the Norway rat. We first established that an animal's hesitation or willingness to explore a novel environment (neophobia and neophilia, respectively) is an identifiable and stable behavioral trait in young-adult males and that neophobia, compared with neophilia, was associated with a greater glucocorticoid response to novelty. Second, we were able to detect behavioral differences among infant rats within a family, and this behavioral disposition at infancy predicted the magnitude of the glucocorticoid response in late middle age. Males identified as neophobic during infancy died sooner than their less fearful brothers. Although both types of males died with similar pathologies (tumors), neophobic males were 60% more likely to die at any point in time. This lifespan study identifies an emotional trait in infancy that predicts an early death and an associated neuroendocrine trait in adulthood that is a potential mechanism underlying the relationship between behavioral style and longevity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available