4.8 Article

On the nature of the multivalency effect: A thermodynamic model

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 125, Issue 52, Pages 16271-16284

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja038223n

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A quantitative model is proposed for the analysis of the thermodynamic parameters of multivalent interactions in dilute solutions or with immobilized multimeric receptor. The model takes into account all bound species and describes multivalent binding via two microscopic binding energies corresponding to inter- and intramolecular interactions (DeltaGdegrees(inter) and DeltaGdegrees(intra)), the relative contributions of which depend on the distribution of complexes with different numbers of occupied binding sites. The third component of the overall free energy, which we call the avidity entropy term, is a function of the degeneracy of bound states, Omega(i), which is calculated on the basis of the topology of interaction and the distribution of all bound species. This term grows rapidly with the number of receptor sites and ligand multivalency, it always favors binding, and explains why multivalency can overcome the loss of conformational entropy when ligands displayed at the ends of long tethers are bound. The microscopic parameters DeltaGdegrees(inter) and DeltadegreesG(intra) may be determined from the observed binding energies for a set of oligovalent ligands by nonlinear fitting with the theoretical model. Here binding data obtained from two series of oligovalent carbohydrate inhibitors for Shiga-like toxins were used to verify the theory. The decavalent and octavalent inhibitors exhibit subnanomolar activity and are the most active soluble inhibitors yet seen that block Shiga-like toxin binding to its native receptor. The theory developed here in conjunction with our protocol for the optimization of tether length provides a predictive approach to design and maximize the avidity of multivalent ligands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available