4.7 Article

BEAM-alemtuzumab reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation for lymphoproliferative diseases: GVHD, toxicity, and survival in 65 patients

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages 428-434

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1406

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the outcomes of reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation using BEAM-alemtuzumab conditioning (carmustine, etoposide, cytosine arabinoside, melphalan, and alemtuzumab 10 mg/d on days -5 to -1) in 6 United Kingdom transplant centers. Sixty-five patients with lymphoproliferative diseases underwent sibling (n=57) or matched unrelated donor (n=8) transplantation. Sustained donor engraftment occurred in 60 (97%) of 62 patients. Of the 56 patients undergoing chimerism studies, 35 (63%) had full donor chimerism. Overall, 73% were in complete remission (CR) after transplantation. At a median follow-up of 1.4 years (range, 0.1-5.6 years), 37 remain alive and in CR. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 11 (117%) of 64, grades I-II only. Estimated 1-year transplantation-related mortality (TRM) was 8% for patients undergoing first transplantation but was significantly worse for those who had previously undergone autologous transplantation. Six patients relapsed (estimated 2-year relapse risk, 20%). Histologic diagnosis (mantle cell lymphoma and high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma) and age at transplantation (>46 years) were significantly associated with higher relapse risk and worse event-free survival. Relapse did not occur in any patient who developed acute or chronic GVHD. This study demonstrates that reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation for lymphoproliferative diseases using a BEAM-alemtuzumab preparative regimen is associated with sustained donor engraftment, a high response rate, minimal toxicity, and a low incidence of GVHD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available