4.7 Article

Prognostic significance of transforming growth factor β receptor II in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer patients

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 491-498

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0320-03

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The role of transforming growth factor P (TGF-beta) in breast cancer is ambiguous; it can display both tumor suppressing and enhancing effects. Activation of the TGF-beta signal transduction system is subject to hormonal regulation. This study was conducted to further analyze the role of TGF-beta receptors in breast cancer and to evaluate their significance as prognostic markers. Experimental Design: Expression of TGF-beta receptor I (TbetaRI) and TGFbeta receptor II (TbetaRII) was retrospectively analyzed by immumohistochemistry in 246 breast cancer patients. Results: Expression of TbetaRI was strongly correlated with tumor size (P < 0.001) and nodal status (P = 0.012) but only weakly with overall survival (P = 0.056). In contrast, TbetaRII was prognostic for overall survival in univariate analysis (P = 0.0370). In estrogen receptor (ER) -negative patients TbetaRII expression was correlated with highly reduced overall survival (P = 0.0083). In multivariate analysis TbetaRII proved to be an independent and highly significant prognostic marker with a hazard ratio of 6.8. Simultaneous loss of both ER and TbetaRII was associated with longer overall survival times comparable with those of ER-positive patients. Conclusions: The results of this exploratory study show that TbetaRII is an independent, highly significant prognostic indicator for overall survival in ER-negative patients. In addition our results are supportive of a mechanism of breast cancer progression in which a selective loss of the tumor inhibitory action of TGFbeta takes place, whereas tumor-promoting aspects remain intact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available