4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Octreotide alone or with prednisone in patients with advanced thymoma and thymic carcinoma: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group phase II trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 293-299

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.047

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [2 R 35 CA39844-08, U 10 CA 21115, R 10 CA 28171-04, P 30 CA 82709-04, CA23318] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To determine the objective response rate, duration of remission and toxicity of octreotide alone or with the later addition of prednisone in patients with unresectable, advanced thymic malignancies in whom the pretreatment octrectide scan was positive. Patients and Methods Forty-two patients with advanced thymoma or thymic carcinoma were entered onto the trial, of whom 38 were fully assessable (one patient had inconclusive histology; three patients had negative octreotide scan). Patients received octreotide 0.5 mg subcutaneously tid. At 2 months, patients were evaluated. Responding patients continued to receive octreotide alone; patients with progressive disease were removed from the study. All others received prednisone 0.6 mg/kg orally qid for a maximum of 1 year. Results Two complete (5.3%) and 10 partial responses (25%) were observed (four partial responses with octreotide alone; the remainder with octreotide plus prednisone). None of the six patients without pure thymoma responded. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 86.6% and 75.7%, respectively. Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 lived significantly longer than did those with a performance status of 1 (P = .031). Conclusion Octreotide alone has modest activity in patients with octrectide scan-positive thymoma. Prednisone improves the overall response rate but is associated with increased toxicity. Additional studies with the agent are warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available