4.8 Article

Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist

Journal

NATURE
Volume 427, Issue 6971, Pages 247-252

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/nature02236

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [E19354] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [E19354] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/R54071/01, GR/R60621/01] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The question of whether it is possible to automate the scientific process is of both great theoretical interest(1,2) and increasing practical importance because, in many scientific areas, data are being generated much faster than they can be effectively analysed. We describe a physically implemented robotic system that applies techniques from artificial intelligence(3-8) to carry out cycles of scientific experimentation. The system automatically originates hypotheses to explain observations, devises experiments to test these hypotheses, physically runs the experiments using a laboratory robot, interprets the results to falsify hypotheses inconsistent with the data, and then repeats the cycle. Here we apply the system to the determination of gene function using deletion mutants of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and auxotrophic growth experiments(9). We built and tested a detailed logical model (involving genes, proteins and metabolites) of the aromatic amino acid synthesis pathway. In biological experiments that automatically reconstruct parts of this model, we show that an intelligent experiment selection strategy is competitive with human performance and significantly outperforms, with a cost decrease of 3-fold and 100-fold (respectively), both cheapest and random-experiment selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available