4.7 Article

Effects of Dietary Genistein on Plasma and Liver Lipids, Hepatic Gene Expression, and Plasma Metabolic Profiles of Hamsters with Diet-Induced Hyperlipidemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 63, Issue 36, Pages 7929-7936

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01590

Keywords

genistein; plasma lipid; liver lipid; hepatic gene expression; plasma metabolic profile; hamster; hyperlipidemia

Funding

  1. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program [ASTIP-IAS12]
  2. Special Basic Research Fund for Central Public Research Institutes [2015ywf-zd-28]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Male hamsters were fed one of the following three diets for 6 weeks (n = 15): normal-fat diet (NFD), high-fat diet (HFD), or HFD + 2 g/kg genistein; the effects of dietary genistein on hyperlipidemia were investigated using traditional and 111 NMR metabonomic approaches. At 6 weeks, compared with the hamsters in the NFD group, those in the HFD group had higher plasma and liver lipids (P < 0.05). Hyperlipidemia was alleviated in the genistein group, with lower plasma cholesterol (9.11 +/- 0.40 vs 12.4 +/- 0.37 mmol/L), triglyceride (8.07 +/- 1.08 vs 14.7 +/- 1.18 mmol/L), LDL cholesterol (2.69 +/- 0.20 vs 4.48 +/- 0.27 mmol/L), malondialdehyde (7.77 +/- 1.64 vs 14.0 +/- 1.15 mu mol/L), and liver cholesterol (20.9 +/- 1.01 vs 29.9 +/- 2.76 mu mol/g) than those in the HFD group (P < 0.05). Expression of hepatic LDL receptor and estrogen receptors a and,6 mRNA in the genistein group were significantly up-regulated, compared with those of the HFD group (P < 0.05). In the H-1 NMR metabonomic analysis, both the small and macromolecular plasma metabolite profiles differed among the three groups, and the metabolic profile of the genistein group was shifted toward that of the NFD group. These results extend our understanding of the beneficial effects of genistein on hyperlipidemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available