4.8 Article

C/EBPαp30, a myeloid leukemia oncoprotein, limits G-CSF receptor expression but not terminal granulopoiesis via site-selective inhibition of C/EBP DNA binding

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 716-725

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207172

Keywords

C/EBP alpha; AML; leukemia; differentiation; cell cycle

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL51388] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heterozygous mutations of the CEBPA gene are present in 5% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases and often lead to the expression of an N-terminally truncated, 30 kDa isoform, C/EBPalphap30, from an internal translation start site. We have assessed the effect of C/EBPalphap30 on granulopoiesis utilizing C/EBPalphap30-ER, containing the estradiol receptor ligand-binding domain. In contrast to C/EBPalpha-ER, C/EBPalphap30-ER did not induce 32Dcl3 myeloid cell differentiation in IL-3. However, both isoforms, when expressed at high levels, were capable of inhibiting E2F activity in 32Dcl3 cells and of slowing their G1 to S progression. C/EBPalphap30 repressed expression of the endogenous G-CSF receptor several-fold. To facilitate investigation of the effect of C/EBPalphap30-ER on granulopoiesis downstream of G-CSF signalling, we coexpressed exogenous G-CSF receptor. C/EBPalphap30-ER/GR cells expressed several granulocytic markers in G-CSF and demonstrated nuclear maturation. Rat C/EBPalpha-ER and C/EBPalphap30-ER, expressed in 293T cells, bound the C/EBP site from the NE gene with similar affinity, as did human C/EBPalpha and C/EBPalphap30. In contrast, C/EBPalphap30 bound the C/EBP sites in the PU.1 or GR gene with 3-6-fold reduced affinity. Thus, the selective inhibition of GR expression by C/EBPalphap30-ER is due in part to its variable affinity for C/EBP sites. Variation in affinity for selected cis elements among isoforms may affect the biology of basic region-leucine zipper (bZIP) proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available