4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Application of solid-phase extraction and micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography to the study of hydrolytic and photolytic degradation of phenoxy acid and phenylurea herbicides

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1024, Issue 1-2, Pages 267-274

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.10.075

Keywords

Microtox; toxicity; photodegradation; pesticides; phenoxy acids; phenylureas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A degradation study of two phenoxy acid [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) propanoic acid and (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy) acetic acid] and two phenylurea (diuron and monolinuron) herbicides, spiked at 50 ppb in water, was performed. Some samples were subjected to neutral and basic hydrolysis; other samples were subjected to photolysis using either sunlight or a xenon arc lamp. After degradation, the water samples were preconcentrated using solid-phase extraction (SPE) with Carbopack B columns and analysed by a micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MECC) system with UV detection at 210 nm. Phenoxyacetic acids were not degraded neither by hydrolysis nor by sunlight photolysis, but they were photodegraded when they were exposed to a xenon arc lamp, with half-lives around 300 min. Phenylurea herbicides were hydrolysed at the two-tested pH, with half-lives varying from 25 to 290 days. The main hydrolysis products were the corresponding chloroanilines. Diuron and monolinuron were also degraded when they were exposed to sunlight and xenon arc lamp. The main photodegradation pathway for diuron corresponded to dehalogenation, while for monolinuron dealkylation and hydroxylation were also postulated. The toxicity of the studied herbicides and their degradation products was evaluated by means of Microtox tests. The obtained results indicated that the toxicity of the degraded samples was higher than the toxicity of the herbicides. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available