4.3 Article

Efficacy of chloroquine, amodiaquine, sulphadoxine- pyrimethamine and combination therapy with artesunate in Mozambican children with non-complicated malaria

Journal

TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 200-208

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01182.x

Keywords

Plasmodium falciparum; antimalarials; first-line treatment; national policy; drug resistance; combination therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports a two-phase study in Manhica district, Mozambique: first we assessed the clinical efficacy and parasitological response of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine (CQ), sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and amodiaquine (AQ), then we tested the safety and efficacy in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria, of three combinations: AQ + SP, artesunate (AR) + SP and AQ + AR. Based on the WHO (1996, WHO/MAL/96.1077) in vivo protocol, we conducted two open, randomized, clinical trials. Children aged 6-59 months with axillary body temperature greater than or equal to37.5 degreesC and non-complicated malaria were randomly allocated to treatment groups and followed up for 21 days (first and second trial) and 28 days (first trial). The therapeutic efficacy of AQ (91.6%) was better than that of SP (82.7%) and CQ (47.1%). After 14 days, 69% of the strains were parasitologically resistant to CQ, 21.4% to SP and 26% to AQ. Co-administration of AQ + SP, AR + SP and AQ + AR was safe and had 100% clinical efficacy at 14-day follow-up. The combination therapies affected rapid fever clearance time and reduced the incidence of gametocytaemia during follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available