4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of a live, quadrivalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine in healthy infants

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 144, Issue 2, Pages 184-190

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.10.054

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To investigate safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of live quadrivalent rotavirus vaccine (QRV) containing human-bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus serotypes G1, G2, G3, and P1a. Study design This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. During 1993 to 1994, at 10 US study sites, 439 healthy infants similar to2 to 6 months of age, were enrolled to receive 3 doses of oral QRV or placebo at approximately 8-week intervals. Results The vaccine was generally well tolerated; no serious vaccine-related adverse experiences were reported. Risk differences and 95% confidence intervals suggested no differences between vaccine and placebo recipients in the incidences of fever, irritability, vomiting, or diarrhea during the 14 days after any dose. QRV was 74.6% efficacious (95% CI: 49.5%, 88.3%) in preventing rotavirus acute gastroenteritis (AGE), regardless of severity and 100% efficacious (95% CI: 43.5%, 100%) in preventing severe rotavirus AGE through one rotavirus season. Serotype G1 was identified in most infants with rotavirus AGE. A greater than or equal to3-fold rise in serum neutralizing antibody to G1 was observed in 57% (45/79) of vaccinees. A greater than or equal to3-fold rise in serum anti-rotavirus IgA and fecal anti-rotavirus IgA was observed in 88% (162/185) and 65% (104/159) of vaccinees, respectively. Conclusions QRV was generally well tolerated, immungenic, paid highly effective against rotavirus gastroenteritis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available