4.7 Article

3D structure model of the principal neutralizing epitope of Minnesota HIV-1 isolate

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 577-590

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2004.10506950

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A hierarchical procedure, using a bottom-up strategy and combining (i) a probabilistic approach for estimating all possible starting structures, (ii) restrained molecular mechanics algorithms for preliminary selection of all energetically preferred conformers, as well as (iii) quantum chemical computations for refining their geometry, was used to study the structural properties of the HIV-MN neutralizing epitope in terms of NMR spectroscopy data. As a result, only one of initial structures matching the experimental and theoretical data was found to be well-ground for implementing the function of immunoreactive conformation of the virus immunogenic crown. The geometric parameters of this structure in water solution were shown to correspond to a double beta-turn conformation similar to that revealed in crystal for synthetic molecules imitating the central region of the HIV-MN V3 loop. The following conclusion was drawn from the comparative analysis of simulated structure with the one computed previously: the HIV-MN immunogenic tip has some inherent conformational flexibility that manifests at the alterations of hexapeptide environment and leads to the structural transitions changing the local conformation of the stretch of interest but retaining its spatial main chain fold. As a matter of record, the high resolution 3D structure model for the HIV-MN principal neutralization site was constructed, and its geometric parameters were compared with the corresponding characteristics of conformers derived earlier for describing the conformational features of immunogenic tip of gp120 from Thailand HIV-1 isolate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available