4.6 Article

X-ray-underluminous active galactic nuclei relative to broad emission lines in ultraluminous infrared galaxies

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages 758-764

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/381069

Keywords

galaxies : active; galaxies : individual (Markarian 463; IRAS 05189-2524, PKS 1345+12, IRAS 07598+6508); galaxies : nuclei; X-rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present X-ray spectra of four ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) with detectable broad near-infrared emission lines produced by active galactic nuclei (AGNs): Mrk 463, PKS 1345+ 12, IRAS 05189 - 2524, and IRAS 07598+ 6508. With the exception of IRAS 07598+ 6508, high-quality X-ray spectra obtained with XMM or Chandra show modest ( 30 - 340 eV) equivalent widths of the 6.4 keV Fe Kalpha emission line and clear signatures for absorption at a level of 4 - 33 x 10(22) cm(-2) for the main power-law components from the AGNs. These spectral properties are typical of Compton-thin AGNs, and so we estimate absorption-corrected 2 - 10 keV X-ray luminosities for the AGNs, L-X(2 - 10 keV) using the Compton-thin assumption. We compare the L-X(2 - 10 keV) values with broad optical/near-infrared emission-line luminosities and confirm a previous finding by Imanishi & Ueno that the L-X(2 - 10 keV) to broad emission-line luminosity ratios in ULIRGs are systematically lower than those of moderately infrared-luminous type 1 AGNs. A comparison of independent energy diagnostic methods suggests that the AGNs are underluminous in the 2 - 10 keV band with respect to their overall spectral energy distributions, as opposed to the broad emission lines being overluminous. This X-ray underluminosity should be taken into account when using 2 - 10 keV X-ray data to investigate the energetic contribution from AGNs to the large infrared luminosities of ULIRGs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available