4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Infraclavicular perineural local anesthetic infusion - A comparison of three dosing regimens for postoperative analgesia

Journal

ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages 395-402

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200402000-00032

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In this randomized, double-blind study, the authors investigated the efficacy of continuous and patient-controlled ropivacaine infusions via an infraclavicular perineural catheter in ambulatory patients undergoing moderately painful orthopedic surgery at or distal to the elbow. Methods: Preoperatively, patients (n = 30) received an infraclavicular perineural catheter and nerve block. Postoperatively, patients were discharged home with both oral analgesics and a portable infusion pump delivering 0.2% ropivacaine (500-ml reservoir) in one of three dosing regimens: the basal group (12 ml/h basal, 0.05-ml patient-controlled bolus dose), the basal-bolus group (8 ml/h basal, 4 ml bolus), or the bolus group (0-3 ml/h basal, 9.9 ml bolus). investigators and patients were blinded to random group assignment. Results: The basal group (n = 10) required more oral analgesics than the basal-bolus group (P = 0.002) and had a shorter median infusion duration than the other two groups (P < 0.001 for both). The bolus group had the longest median infusion duration (P < 0.001 for both) but experienced an increase in breakthrough pain incidence (P = 0.004) and intensity (P = 0.04 vs. basal-bolus group) as well as sleep disturbances (P < 0.001 for both) compared with the other groups. Overall satisfaction was greatest in the basal-bolus group (9.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 7.9 +/- 1.7 and 8.1 +/- 1.5; P < 0.05 for both). Conclusions: After moderately painful orthopedic surgery at or distal to the elbow, 0.2% ropivacaine delivered as a continuous infusion combined with patient-controlled. bolus doses via an infraclavicular perineural catheter optimizes analgesia while minimizing oral analgesic use compared with basal- or bolus-only dosing regimens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available