4.7 Article

Structures of BaF2-CaF2 heterolayers and their influences on ionic conductivity

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages 2375-2381

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1635809

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, artificial ion conductors have been prepared by growing epitaxial heterolayers consisting of BaF2-CaF2 using molecular beam epitaxy. The ionic conductivity of these heterolayers shows a strong dependence on the layer thickness [N. Sata, S. Eberman, K. Eberl, and J. Maier, Nature 408, 996 (2000)]. In this paper three such heterolayers with different spacings (sample A: 80 nm, sample B: 10 nm, sample C: 1 nm) are investigated by conventional transmission electron microscopy and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. The spacings are chosen such that they fall into the three conductivity regimes observed in N. Sata (l>50 nm; 8<50 nm; l<8 nm). In accordance with conductivity studies, the samples with spacings of 10 nm or greater (A,B) are epitaxial and continuous, whereas in the case of extremely small spacing (C) the continuity of the layers is destroyed by formation of a column-like structure. Analytical electron microscopy reveals that, instead of forming multilayers, Ca and Ba separate in different columns in sample C. The structure properties of sample A (large l) are quite ideal: Planar interfaces with regular arrays of misfit dislocations with their Burgers vectors on the interface are observed. In the case of sample B (medium l) the lattice misfit is accommodated, in addition, by wavy interfaces associated with dislocations characterized by a Burgers vector that makes a large angle to the interfaces. The (111) lattice spacing very close to the interfaces is markedly changed due to this novel relaxation mechanism in the multilayer. The influences of the crystallographic defects on the ionic conductivity are also discussed. (C) 2004 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available