4.7 Article

Determining the threshold effect of ozone on daily mortality: an analysis of ozone and mortality in Seoul, Korea, 1995-1999

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages 113-119

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2003.09.006

Keywords

threshold; ozone; daily mortality; air pollution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many studies have shown a positive association between ambient ozone levels and mortality. Typically, these findings are based on models that assume a linear relationship between log mortality and ozone level. In this study, we adapted generalized additive models in which ozone effects are presumed to occur in three different ways: as a simple linear term, as a cubic natural spline term, and as a combination of two linear terms (a threshold model). We applied these models to daily time-series data for Seoul, Korea for the years 1995-1999 and found that the threshold model always fits best among the three. A 2.6% (95% CI: 1.7-3.5) increase of estimated relative risk (RR) in the total mortality associated with a 21.5 ppb increase of daily I-h maximum ozone lagged by I day was observed by linear Poisson's regression. However, a 3.4% (95% CI: 2.3-4.4) increase in the estimated RR was observed using the threshold model. Adjustments for other ambient pollutants caused little changes to these results; 2.4-2.5% in the linear models and 3.2-3.4% in the threshold models. In addition, the largest difference in the estimated RRs of the linear and threshold models was observed in the summer: 1.9% (95% CI: 0.5-3.3) by the linear model and 3.8% (95% CI: 2.0-5.7) by the threshold model. These findings indicate that the conventional time-series Poisson regression model, which dose not take threshold into consideration, could underestimate the true risk of the ozone effect on daily mortality. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available