4.5 Article

Improving recognition of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a retrospective case note review

Journal

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
Volume 99, Issue 12, Pages 1074-1077

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306366

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Northumberland Tyne and Wear Comprehensive Local Research Network
  2. Northern Deanery
  3. MRC [MR/K000608/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [MR/K000608/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10036] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Over the last 30 years, there has been little improvement in the age of diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) (mean age of 4.5-4.11 years). Aim To review the diagnostic process for DMD in boys without a family history in order to identify where delays occur and suggest areas for improvement. Design A retrospective case note review. Setting A tertiary centre for neuromuscular diseases in England. Patients All boys without family history diagnosed with DMD in the last 10 years (n=20). Outcome measures Mean age at four key steps in the diagnostic pathway of DMD. Results (1) Age at first reported symptoms of DMD was 32.5 (8-72) months (2.7 years). (2) First engagement of a healthcare professional was at 42.9 (10-90) months. (3) Creatine kinase (CK) levels were checked at 50.1 (14-91) months. (4) Diagnosis of DMD was confirmed at 51.7 (16-91) months (4.3 years). The total delay from parental concern to diagnosis was 19.2 (4-50) months (1.6 years). Conclusions Our study shows an improvement in the age of diagnosis of DMD although there continues to be a delay in presentation to a health professional and a delay in obtaining a CK test. To reduce these delays, we propose screening for DMD as part of the Child Health Surveillance Programme, in addition to lowering the threshold for CK testing in primary care by promoting a new DMD mnemonic MUSCLE. An earlier diagnosis of DMD will allow timely access to genetic counselling, standards of care and clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available