4.6 Review

Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles:: a review of observations

Journal

JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 143-176

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003

Keywords

atmospheric aerosols; nucleation; condensation growth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past decade, the formation and growth of nanometer-size atmospheric aerosol particles have been observed at a number of sites around the world. Measurements of particle formation have been performed on different platforms (ground, ships, aircraft) and over different time periods (campaign or continuous-type measurements). The development during the 1990s of new instruments to measure nanoparticle size distributions and several gases that participate in nucleation have enabled these new discoveries. Measurements during nucleation episodes of evolving size distributions down to 3 nm can be used to calculate the apparent source rate of 3-nm particles and the particle growth rate. We have collected existing data from the literature and data banks (campaigns and continuous measurements), representing more than 100 individual investigations. We conclude that the formation rate of 3-nm particles is often in the range 0.01-10 cm(-3) s(-1) in the boundary layer. However, in urban areas formation rates are often higher than this (up to 100 cm(-3) s(-1)), and rates as high as 10(4)-10(5) cm(-3) s(-1) have been observed in coastal areas and industrial plumes. Typical particle growth rates are in the range 1-20 nm h(-1) in mid-latitudes depending on the temperature and the availability of condensable vapours. Over polar areas the growth rate can be as low as 0.1 nm h(-1). Because nucleation can lead to a significant increase in the number concentration of cloud condensation nuclei, global climate models will require reliable models for nucleation. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available