4.7 Article

Correlation between preoperative serum concentration of type IV collagen 7s domain and hepatic failure following resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGERY
Volume 239, Issue 2, Pages 186-193

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000109152.48425.4d

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the predictive value of the preoperative serum concentration of type IV collagen 7s domain (7s collagen) for postoperative hepatic failure in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Summary Background Data: Clear and reliable criteria for predicting hepatic failure after liver resection are needed. The serum 7s collagen concentration correlates with the histologic degree of active hepatitis and hepatic fibrosis and may predict the regenerative potential of the liver. Methods: Potential risk factors for postoperative hepatic failure, including the serum 7s collagen concentration, were evaluated in 251 patients who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Prognostic significance was determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Hepatic failure developed postoperatively in 25 patients, 4 of whom died. The serum 7s collagen concentration correlated with the histologic degree of hepatitis activity and hepatic fibrosis. The serum 7s collagen concentration was a risk factor for postoperative hepatic failure by univariate analysis and was the only risk factor on multivariate analysis. No patient with a serum 7s collagen concentration < 12 ng/mL died of postoperative hepatic failure, and all 4 patients who died had a serum 7s collagen concentration greater than or equal to 12 ng/mL. Conclusions: The preoperative serum 7s collagen concentration correlated independently with hepatic failure following liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients whose serum 7s collagen is greater than or equal to 12 ng/mL are poor candidates for hepatic resection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available