4.5 Article

Biosynthesis of proopiomelanocortin-derived peptides in prohormone convertase 2 and 7B2 null mice

Journal

ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 145, Issue 2, Pages 519-528

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2003-0829

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R56 DA005084, DA 05084, R01 DA005084] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK049703, DK 48703] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prohormone convertases (PCs) are thought to represent the major proteinases involved in the biosynthetic processing of peptide hormone precursors to bioactive peptide products. The maturation of PC2 requires the aid of a helper protein, 7B2, in order for the zymogen to become an active enzyme species. The 7B2 and PC2 nulls should thus be functionally equivalent with regard to deficits in precursor processing. In this article, we have examined this proposition through the study of proopiomelanocortin ( POMC) biosynthesis and granule content in both null models. RIA data indicate that both PC2 and 7B2 nulls lack pituitary alpha-MSH; interestingly, 7B2 nulls are still able to generate beta-endorphin from beta-lipotropin, whereas PC2 nulls contain little if any beta-endorphin. Labeling experiments demonstrate a build-up of POMC, high molecular weight intermediates, and intact ACTH, as well as the disappearance of alpha-MSH, in both null models. Electron microscopy of neurointermediate lobe melanotrophs reveals the presence of a significantly greater number of secretory granules in both 7B2 and PC2 nulls compared with wild-type controls. However, PC2 null melanotrophs contain twice as many granules as 7B2 null melanotrophs. Another difference between the two null models is a relatively enhanced accumulation of precursors in the PC2 null compared with the 7B2 null; these include not only PC2 substrates, but also presumed PC1 substrates. These data indicate that the two nulls are not phenotypically equivalent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available