3.9 Article

Negative regulation of insulin-stimulated mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling by Grb10

Journal

MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 350-358

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/me.2003-0117

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK52933] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Grb10 is a Pleckstrin homology and Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing protein that binds to the tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptor in response to insulin stimulation. Loss of Grb10 function in mice results in fetal and placental overgrowth; however, the molecular mechanism remains unknown. In the present study, we show that overexpression of Grb10 in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the insulin receptor or in 3T3-L1 adipocytes reduced insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of MAPK. Overexpression of Grb10 in rat primary adipocytes also inhibited insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of the MAPK downstream substrate Elk1. To determine the mechanism by which Grb10 inhibited insulin-stimulated MAPK signaling, we examined whether Grb10 affects the phosphorylation of MAPK upstream signaling components. We found that overexpression of Grb10 inhibited the insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of Shc, a positive regulator of the MAPK signaling pathway. The inhibitory effect was diminished when the SH2 domain of Grb10 was deleted. The negative role of Grb10 in insulin signaling was established by suppression of endogenous Grb10 by RNA interference in HeLa cells overexpressing the insulin receptor, which enhanced insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of MAPK, Shc, and Akt. Taken together, our findings suggest that Grb10 functions as a negative regulator in the insulin-stimulated MAPK signaling pathway. In addition, the inhibitory effect of Grb10 on the MAPK pathway is most likely due to a direct block of insulin-stimulated Shc tyrosine phosphorylation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available