4.7 Article

Evidence of a novel quantitative-trait locus for obesity on chromosome 4p in Mexican Americans

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages 272-282

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/381717

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK053889, R01 DK079195, DK47482, DK42273, DK53889, R01 DK047482] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R37 MH059490, R01 MH059490, MH59490] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although several genomewide scans have identified quantitative-trait loci influencing several obesity-related traits in humans, genes influencing normal variation in obesity phenotypes have not yet been identified. We therefore performed a genome scan of body mass index (BMI) on Mexican Americans, a population prone to obesity and diabetes, using a variance-components linkage analysis to identify loci that influence BMI. We used phenotypic data from 430 individuals (26% diabetics, 59% females, mean age+/-SD=43+/-17 years, mean BMI+/-SD=30.0+/-6.7, mean leptin (ng/ml)+/-SD=22.1+/-17.1) distributed across 27 low-income Mexican American pedigrees who participated in the San Antonio Family Diabetes Study (SAFDS) for whom a 10-15-cM map is available. In this genomewide search, after accounting for the covariate effects of age, sex, diabetes, and leptin, we identified a genetic region exhibiting the most highly significant evidence for linkage (LOD 4.5) with BMI on chromosome 4p (4p15.1) at 42 cM, near marker D4S2912. This linkage result has been confirmed in an independent linkage study of severe obesity in Utah pedigrees. Two strong positional candidates, the human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 (PPARGC1) and cholecystokinin A receptor (CCKAR) with major roles in the development of obesity, are located in this region. In conclusion, we identified a major genetic locus influencing BMI on chromosome 4p in Mexican Americans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available