4.7 Article

Lycopene Inhibits the lsomerization of β-Carotene during Quenching of Singlet Oxygen and Free Radicals

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 63, Issue 12, Pages 3279-3287

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00377

Keywords

lycopene; beta-carotene; singlet oxygen; radicals; isomerization; quenching

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study aimed to investigate the influence of singlet oxygen and radical species on the isomerization of carotenoids. On the one hand, lycopene and beta-carotene standards were incubated with 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene-1,4-endoperoxide that produced singlet oxygen in situ. (13Z)- and (15Z)-beta-carotene were preferentially generated at low concentrations of singlet oxygen, while high concentrations resulted in formation of (9Z)-beta-carotene. The addition of different concentrations of lycopene led to the same isomerization progress of beta-carotene, but resulted in a decreased formation of (9Z)-beta-carotene and retarded degradation of (all-E)-beta-carotene. On the other hand, isomerization of beta-carotene and lycopene was induced by ABTS-radicals, too. As expected from the literature, chemical quenching was observed especially for lycopene, while physical quenching was preferred for beta-carotene. Mixtures of beta-carotene and lycopene resulted in a different isomerization progress compared to the separate beta-carotene model. As long as lycopene was present, almost no isomerization of beta-carotene was triggered; after that, strong formation of (13Z)-, (9Z)-, and (15Z)-beta-carotene was initiated. In summary, lycopene protected beta-carotene against isomerization during reactions with singlet oxygen and radicals. These findings can explain the pattern of carotenoid isomers analyzed in fruits and vegetables, where lycopene containing samples showed higher (all-E)/(9Z)-beta-carotene ratios, and also in in vivo samples such as human blood plasma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available