4.7 Article

Pegylated recombinant interferon alpha-2b vs recombinant interferon alpha-2b for the initial treatment of chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia: a phase III study

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 309-315

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403217

Keywords

chronic phase; chronic myelogenous leukemia; PEG Intron (R); pegylated recombinant interferon alpha-2b

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recombinant interferon alpha-2b (rIFN-alpha2b) is an effective therapy for chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Polyethylene glycol-modified rIFN-alpha2b is a novel formulation with a serum half-life (similar to40 h) compatible with once-weekly dosing. This open-label, noninferiority trial randomized 344 newly diagnosed CML patients: 171 received subcutaneous pegylated rIFN-alpha2b (6 mug/kg/week); 173 received rIFN-alpha2b ( 5 million International Units/m(2)/day). Primary efficacy end point was the 12-month major cytogenetic response (MCR) rate (<35% Philadelphia chromosome-positive cells). Modified efficacy analysis included all MCRs > 12 months, except for patients discontinuing treatment after 6 months and achieving an MCR on other salvage therapy. The MCR rates were 23% for pegylated rIFN-alpha2b vs 28% for rIFN-alpha2b in the primary efficacy analysis and 26 vs 28% in the prospectively modified efficacy analysis. However, a significant imbalance in baseline hematocrit (HCT), a significant predictor of cytogenetic response (P = 0.0001), was discovered: 51 (30%) patients treated with pegylated rIFN-alpha2b had low HCT (<33%) vs 33 (19%) rIFN-alpha 2b-treated patients. Among patients with HCT >33%, the MCR rate was 33 vs 31%. The adverse event profile of weekly pegylated rIFN-alpha2b was comparable to daily rIFN-alpha2b. Once-weekly pegylated rIFN-alpha2b is an active agent for the treatment of newly diagnosed CML with an efficacy and safety profile similar to daily rIFN-alpha2b, although statistical noninferiority was not demonstrated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available