4.6 Article

Increased levels of serum sulfite in patients with acute pneumonia

Journal

SHOCK
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 99-102

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.shk.0000105501.75189.85

Keywords

neutrophil; sulfite; pneumonia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sulfite, a common air pollutant, is toxic for humans, causing hypersensitivity or chronic airway diseases. We previously reported that sulfite is actively produced from neutrophils by stimulation with bacterial endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We also found that the serum sulfite concentration is increased in a rat model of sepsis induced by systemic injection of LPS. However, information on sulfite metabolism in human inflammatory conditions is limited. In the current study, the serum concentration of sulfite was determined in 25 patients with acute pneumonia. Serum sulfite concentration in pneumonia patients was significantly higher than that in control subjects (3.75 +/- 0.88 vs. 1.23 +/- 0.48 muM, respectively, P < 0.05). Among 20 patients, serum sulfite was serially determined before and after antibiotic therapy. The levels of serum sulfite were significantly reduced during the recovery phase compared with those during the acute phase (1.34 +/- 0.56 vs. 3.65 +/- 0.92 muM, respectively, P < 0.05). Moreover, neutrophils obtained from three patients during the acute phase of pneumonia spontaneously produced higher amounts of sulfite in vitro than those obtained after recovery. There was a close positive correlation (r = 0.71, P < 0.05) between serum sulfite and C-reactive protein (CRIP) in patients with pneumonia. Taken together, the current findings suggest that serum sulfite increases during systemic inflammation in humans. Activated neutrophils might be responsible, at least in part, for the up-regulation of sulfite. Given various biological effects reported previously, sulfite may act as a mediator in inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available