4.5 Article

Minimum ionizing and alpha particles detectors based on epitaxial semiconductor silicon carbide

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 238-244

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2004.825095

Keywords

alpha particle; epitaxial semiconductors; minimum ionizing particle; radiation detectors; silicon carbide; Schottky contact; spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relatively high value of the energy required to produce an electron-hole pair in silicon carbide, SiC, by a minimum ionizing particle (MIP) against the value for Si, imposes severe constrains in the crystallographic quality, the thickness and the doping concentration of the SiC epitaxial layer used as the detection medium. In this work, a 40 pin thick 4 H-SiC epitaxial layer with a low doping concentration of similar to5 x 10(13) cm(-3) was used in order to have a relatively high number (similar to2200) of e-h pairs generated by a MIP and to deplete the total active layer at relatively low reverse bias (60 V). The detectors are realized by the formation of a nickel silicide (Ni2Si) on the silicon surface of the epitaxial layer (Schottky contact) and of the ohmic contact on the backside of a 4 H-SiC heavily doped substrate. We present experimental data on the charge collection properties with a-particles from Am-241 and beta-particles from Sr-90. In both cases, a 100% charge collection efficiency, CCE, is demonstrated and the diffusion contribution of the minority charge carriers to CCE is pointed out. The charge spectrum for MIPs from Sr-90 shows a full detection efficiency with the pedestal (noise) clearly separated by the signal (Landau distribution) at reverse bias values comparable and higher than the one needed to totally deplete the layer. Moreover, no degradation was observed at 94degreesC in the CCE and in the energy resolution of the Am-241 alpha-signal from the SiC detector.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available