4.6 Article

Cartilage link protein interacts with neurocan, which shows hyaluronan binding characteristics different from CD44 and TSG-6

Journal

MATRIX BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 629-639

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2003.11.007

Keywords

neurocan; link protein; hyaluronan; link module

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction of neurocan with hyaluronan was qualitatively characterized with alkaline phosphatase fusion proteins secreted by mammalian cells. The wild type neurocan hyaluronan binding domain fused to alkaline phosphatase bound to immobilized hyaluronan under physiological as well as moderately hypertonic conditions, whereas its ability to bind to immobilized chondroitin sulfate dropped rapidly with increasing salt concentration. Strong hyaluronan binding ability was still evident when in both link modules within the hyaluronan binding domain a basic amino acid was mutated, which is well conserved among link modules of hyaluronan binding proteins. A strong enhancement of the binding of neurocan to immobilized hyaluronan was observed after preincubation of the immobilized hyaluronan with cartilage link protein. Moreover, this preincubation mediated also the binding of a fusion protein representing only the immunoglobulin module of neurocan linked to alkaline phosphatase, which showed no binding to immobilized hyaluronan alone. The interaction of the neurocan immunoglobulin module with link protein could also be shown by overlay blot analysis. These observations suggest that the hyaluronan binding characteristics of paired link modules are different from those of single link modules, and that the reported temporal co-expression of cartilage link protein and of neurocan in developing brain implicates the possibility of a cooperative function of these molecules. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. International Society of Matrix Biology. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available