4.8 Article

Effect of ferric chloride addition on the removal of Cu and Zn complexes with EDTA during municipal wastewater treatment

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 921-932

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.10.004

Keywords

EDTA; adsorption; ferric hydroxide; primary treatment; metal speciation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of the synthetic chelating agent ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in municipal wastewater has a significant impact on the efficacy of wastewater treatment plants because pollutant metal-EDTA complexes are difficult to remove. To understand the potential of FeCl3 addition during primary treatment to improve metal removal, laboratory experiments and a full-scale study were conducted. Results of laboratory experiments designed to simulate primary and secondary wastewater treatment indicate that a portion of pollutant metal-EDTA species can be converted into FeEDTA(-) by addition of FeCl3 during simulated primary treatment. Addition of FeCl3 also resulted in improved metal removal by adsorption. The combination of these two processes improved removal of Cu and Zn by 20% during simulated primary treatment. During full-scale treatment, a slight increase in the concentration of FeEDTA(-) in secondary effluent was observed when FeCl3 was added during primary treatment. However, FeCl3 addition had no observable effect on metal concentrations in the wastewater effluent. The most noticeable change in EDTA speciation at full scale occurred during primary treatment, where most of the pollutant metal-EDTA complexes were converted into FeEDTA(-), irrespective of whether or not FeCl3 was added. The formation of FeEDTA(-) during primary treatment plays a potentially important role in metal removal and should be considered in future evaluations of wastewater treatment plant performance. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available