4.4 Article

Evidence for expression of a single distinct form of mammalian cysteine dioxygenase

Journal

AMINO ACIDS
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 99-106

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-003-0001-4

Keywords

cysteine dioxygenase; cysteine; isozymes; molecular mass

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK56649] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cysteine dioxygenase (CDO) plays a critical role in the regulation of cellular cysteine concentration. Because multiple forms of CDO (similar to23 kDa, similar to25 kDa, and similar to68 kDa) have been claimed based upon separation and detection using SDS-PAGE/western blotting (with antibodies demonstrated to immunoprecipitate CDO), we further investigated the possibility of more than one CDO isoform. Using either rabbit antibody raised against purified rat liver CDO or against purified recombinant his(6)-tagged CDO (r-his(6)-CDO) and using 15% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide for the SDS-PAGE, we consistently detected the similar to25 kDa band, but never detected a similar to68 kDa band, in rat liver, kidney, lung and brain. Nondenatured gel electrophoresis of r-his(6)-CDO yielded a molecular mass estimate of 25.7 kDa and no evidence of dimerization. Mass spectrometry of r-his(6)-CDO yielded two peaks with molecular masses of 24.1 kDa and 24.3 kDa. Anion-exchange FPLC of r-his(6)-CDO also gave two peaks, with the first containing CDO that was 7.5-times as active as the more anionic form that eluted second. When the two peaks recovered from FPLC were run on SDS/PAGE, the first (more active) CDO fraction yielded two bands (perhaps as an artifact of SDS/PAGE), whereas the second (less active) CDO fraction yielded only the similar to23 kDa band. We conclude that the physiologically active form of CDO is the similar to25 kDa (i.e., 23.5 kDa based on mass spectrometry) monomer and that this active form is probably derived by post-translational modification of the 23 kDa gene product.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available