4.7 Article

Is there an association between level of adult blood pressure and nephron number or renal filtration surface area?

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 582-588

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00406.x

Keywords

kidney; glomerulus; nephron; filtration surface area; blood pressure; F(2)1 hybrid; F-2 hybrid; stereology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Reductions in renal filtration surface area (FSA) have been linked to development of hypertension. This study investigated whether there are direct relationships, in the adult rat, between levels of blood pressure and nephron number or total renal FSA. Methods. F-1 and F-2 offspring were generated from a spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR)/Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rat cross. Tail-cuff systolic blood pressure was measured twice weekly from 5 to 15 weeks of age and mean arterial blood pressure determined prior to sacrifice. At 15 weeks of age, the rats were perfusion-fixed and glomerular (and thereby nephron) number, glomerular size, total length, and surface area of glomerular capillaries and total renal FSA were determined using unbiased stereologic techniques. Results. In F1 offspring, blood pressure levels were midway between the SHR and WKY rats. Nephron number was significantly higher in the WKY rats compared to the SHR and F1 offspring. However, there was no difference in nephron number between the F1 rats and SHR and no difference in renal FSA between the three groups. In the F-2 generation, where there is random segregation of the SHR and WKY genes, there was no significant correlation between either nephron number and adult blood pressure (r(2) = 0.16, P = 0.11) or total renal FSA and adult blood pressure (r(2) = 0.02, P = 0.58). There was a significant inverse correlation between nephron number and glomerular size (r(2) = 0.49, P = 0.0043). Conclusion. There is not a direct corollary between nephron number or renal FSA and level of blood pressure in this rat model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available