4.6 Article

The effect of short-term estradiol therapy on cognitive function in older men receiving hormonal suppression therapy for prostate cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 269-273

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52067.x

Keywords

estrogen; cognitive function; older men; estradiol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of estrogen (E) alone (without the influence of testosterone (T)) on cognitive function in older men, using 17-beta micronized estradiol versus placebo in older men rendered hypogonadal (low T and E) by treatment for prostate cancer. DESIGN: Short-term double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: An outpatient General Clinical Research Center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven community-dwelling men aged 65 and older receiving neoadjuvant or established therapy with luteinizing-hormone releasing-hormone agonists for treatment of prostate cancer enrolled in a short-term randomized, controlled trial of 17-beta micronized estradiol versus placebo on the effect on biochemical markers of bone turnover. MEASUREMENTS: Hormone levels, including E, T, and sex hormone-binding globulin; standardized neurocognitive tests, including measures of sustained attention, executive function, and memory; and questionnaires to assess subjects' perception of cognitive deficits and symptoms of depression. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between patients receiving E or placebo on 15 of 17 neurocognitive measures and no significant differences in self-reported cognitive deficits or number of depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Although studies have suggested that E replacement therapy may improve cognitive function, most notably memory performance in postmenopausal woman, there was no evidence in the present study that the addition of short-term E therapy was more beneficial than placebo in tests of cognitive performance in hypogonadal men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available