4.7 Article

Genetic diversity and structure of urban populations of Pieris butterflies assessed using amplified fragment length polymorphism

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 245-258

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02040.x

Keywords

AFLP; dispersal; isolation by distance; Pieris; seasonality; urban ecology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conservation programs in urban ecosystems need to determine the genetic background in populations of urban dwellers. We examined the genetic diversity and structure of Pieris rapae and P. melete using AFLP markers, and compared them between species and between urban and rural environments. As a result: (i) in both species, there was no reduction in genetic diversity within urban populations by direct comparison of diversity measurements, although the analysis of molecular variance suggested significant reductions in the variance within seasonal subpopulations in urban populations; (ii) P. rapae retained greater genetic diversity within species and populations; (iii) populations of both species showed significant genetic differentiation, and P. melete was more strongly subdivided; (iv) in both species, geographically close populations did not cluster with one another in the UPGMA analysis; (v) there was no genetic isolation due to geographical distance in either species; (vi) the genetic composition of seasonal subpopulations differed in urban populations of both species, and the genetic distances among subpopulations were correlated with seasonal differences in P. rapae and with temporal differences in P. melete. These results indicate that the genetic diversity in urban populations of both species was reduced at times, but was maintained by dispersal from genetically differentiated populations. Differences in the ability and mode of dispersal in the two species may be reflected in the degree of population subdivision and patterns of seasonal change in the genetic composition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available