4.4 Article

Dexamethasone lacks effect on blood pressure in mice with a disrupted endothelial NO synthase gene

Journal

NITRIC OXIDE-BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 36-41

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.niox.2004.01.008

Keywords

endothelium; endothelial nitric oxide synthase; gene expression; blood pressure; ethylisothiourea; serum nitrite and nitrate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cushing's syndrome and systemic administration of glucocorticoids are associated with hypertension, but the underlying molecular mechanism is only partially understood. We have shown previously that dexamethasone downregulates the expression of the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) gene in human endothelial cells and in the rat and that this may contribute to the blood pressure-raising effect of the steroid [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 13357]. In the current communication, we demonstrated that dexamethasone increased mean arterial blood pressure in wild-type C-57 B16 mice (eNOS(+/+) mice), but had no effect on blood pressure in mice with a disrupted eNOS gene (eNOS(-/-) mice) derived from the same strain. The NOS inhibitor ethylisothiourea, used for control purposes, showed a hypertensive effect in eNOS(+/+) mice, but no such effect in eNOS(-/-) mice. Serum NO2-/NO3- levels, an indicator of total body NO synthesis, decreased significantly when eNOS(+/+) mice were treated with dexamethasone. eNOS(-/-) mice had lower serum NO2-/ NO3- levels per se, which were not changed significantly by dexamethasone. Dexamethasone decreased the expression of eNOS in three major organs of the mouse investigated, namely the heart, the liver, and the kidney. We conclude that the expressional down-regulation of eNOS and the ensuing reduction in vascular NO production contributes to the hypertension caused by glucocorticoids. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available