4.8 Article

Chromosome termini of the monocot plant Othocallis siberica are maintained by telomerase, which specifically synthesises vertebrate-type telomere sequences

Journal

PLANT JOURNAL
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 484-493

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01974.x

Keywords

Arabidopsis-type telomeric sequences; FISH; Othocallis siberica; telomerase; TRAP assay; vertebrate-type telomeric sequences

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lack of Arabidopsis-type T(3)AG(3) telomere sequences has recently been reported for the majority of investigated taxa of the monocot order Asparagales. In order to investigate this phenomenon in more detail, we conducted extensive cytogenetic and molecular analyses of the telomeres in Othocallis siberica, a member of this order. Terminal restriction fragment analysis together with Bal31 exonuclease assay showed that chromosome termini in O. siberica are formed by long stretches (more than 10 kbp) of vertebrate-type T(2)AG(3) repeats. In addition, telomerase activity specifically synthesising (T(2)AG(3))(n) sequence was detected in O. siberica protein extracts by telomerase repeat amplification protocol (TRAP). Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) revealed the presence of the vertebrate-type T(2)AG(3) telomere sequences at all chromosome termini and at a few additional regions of O. siberica chromosomes, whereas Arabidopsis-type T(3)AG(3) DNA and peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes did not hybridise to chromosomes of Othocallis, except for polymorphic blocks in chromosomes 2 (interstitial) and 4 (terminal). These interstitial/terminal regions are apparently composed of large blocks of (T(2)AG(3))(n) and (T(3)AG(3))(n) DNA and represent a unique example of interspersion of two types of telomeric repeats within one genome. This may be a reflection of the recent evolutionary switch from Arabidopsis- to vertebrate-type telomeric repeats in this plant group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available