4.7 Article

Visual and quantitative evaluation of selected image combination schemes in ultrasound spatial compound scanning

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 181-190

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2003.822824

Keywords

anatomy; compound operators; contrast; histology; spatial compound ultrasound; speckle signal-to-noise ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-angle spatial compound images are normally generated by averaging the recorded single-angle images (SAIs). To exploit possible advantages associated with alternative combination schemes, this paper investigates both the effect of number of angles (Ntheta) as well as operator (mean, median, mean-excluding-maximum (mem), root-mean-square (rms), geometric mean and maximum) on image quality (tissue delineation and artifacts), speckle signal-to-noise ratio (SNRs) and contrast. The evaluation is based on in vitro SAI (+/-21degrees in steps of Deltatheta = 7degrees) of formalin fixed porcine tissue containing adipose, connective and muscular tissue. Image quality increased with number of angles up to +/-14degrees after which the improvements became debatable. The mem and median operators, which try to render the images more quantitatively correct by suppressing strong echoes from specular reflectors, provide some improvement in this regard. When combining the SAI with the mean operator, the SNRs increases-in general-with N-theta. For N-theta = 2, the SNRs increases with Deltatheta as expected. When N-theta = 7, the highest SNRs is obtained for the mem, rms, and geometric mean operators, while the lowest SNRs is obtained for the maximum operator. When comparing SNRs for adipose and fibrous tissue, the level is close to 1.91 for adipose tissue but only 1.7 for fibrous tissue which contain relatively few organized scattering structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available